i finally got a chance to go car shopping today. i tried out the grand touring mazda. i really like the ride and i might buy it if they knock off some of the price for paying cash. the real story today came at buy n save.
Tyler and I went to get sandwiches and then to get a snack at buy n save. i went n picked up a couple drinks and while i was making a decision i put my sunglasses down. all the while this woman in an orange vest was standing behind us. as soon as i walked out the door i realized i forgot my sunglasses. tyler went back inside, and said he couldnt find them. i figured he just forgot where i set them down, so i went inside, and they were gone. its only been about a minute n a half since i put my sunglasses down that they were gone. i talk to the store manager, but apparently there cameras dont even work.... nice to know.
so i confront the woman about it. she practically gets right in my face and says no. i come back about 15 minutes later, confront her again, she starts screaming at me this time. "just call the police! ive never fuckin stole anything in my life, how dare you acuse me of stealing, it was probably the 2 mexicans behind me! just call the police!" there were no other people in the store, just her, tyler, and i.
at this point, i dont think i will ever see those sunglasses again. but you never know...
Thursday, August 2, 2007
Thursday, July 26, 2007
full tilt eating my cornhole
all day....
i just havent seemed to catch a break. last hand happened like this
Full Tilt Poker Game #3067025347: Table Firm (heads up) - $5/$10 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:26:05 ET - 2007/07/26
pez_vela has 5 seconds left to act
pez_vela posts the small blind of $5
Kadabra posts the big blind of $10
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Kadabra [Qc Ah]
pez_vela raises to $30
Kadabra calls $20
*** FLOP *** [8h 3d 8d]
Kadabra checks
pez_vela bets $45
Kadabra raises to $132
pez_vela calls $87
*** TURN *** [8h 3d 8d] [Qh]
Kadabra checks
pez_vela bets $397.20, and is all in
Kadabra calls $397.20
pez_vela shows [5d 5h]
Kadabra shows [Qc Ah]
*** RIVER *** [8h 3d 8d Qh] [5c]
pez_vela shows a full house, Fives full of Eights
Kadabra shows two pair, Queens and Eights
pez_vela wins the pot ($1,117.90) with a full house, Fives full of Eights
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $1,118.40 | Rake $0.50
Board: [8h 3d 8d Qh 5c]
Seat 1: pez_vela (small blind) showed [5d 5h] and won ($1,117.90) with a full house, Fives full of Eights
Seat 2: Kadabra (big blind) showed [Qc Ah] and lost with two pair, Queens and Eights
its like i cant catch a break all day. i need a massage
i just havent seemed to catch a break. last hand happened like this
Full Tilt Poker Game #3067025347: Table Firm (heads up) - $5/$10 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:26:05 ET - 2007/07/26
pez_vela has 5 seconds left to act
pez_vela posts the small blind of $5
Kadabra posts the big blind of $10
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Kadabra [Qc Ah]
pez_vela raises to $30
Kadabra calls $20
*** FLOP *** [8h 3d 8d]
Kadabra checks
pez_vela bets $45
Kadabra raises to $132
pez_vela calls $87
*** TURN *** [8h 3d 8d] [Qh]
Kadabra checks
pez_vela bets $397.20, and is all in
Kadabra calls $397.20
pez_vela shows [5d 5h]
Kadabra shows [Qc Ah]
*** RIVER *** [8h 3d 8d Qh] [5c]
pez_vela shows a full house, Fives full of Eights
Kadabra shows two pair, Queens and Eights
pez_vela wins the pot ($1,117.90) with a full house, Fives full of Eights
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $1,118.40 | Rake $0.50
Board: [8h 3d 8d Qh 5c]
Seat 1: pez_vela (small blind) showed [5d 5h] and won ($1,117.90) with a full house, Fives full of Eights
Seat 2: Kadabra (big blind) showed [Qc Ah] and lost with two pair, Queens and Eights
its like i cant catch a break all day. i need a massage
Bobby Baldwin's message
"I've heard good players complian to me about how they get outdrawn all of the time. But if they want to better their game and their emotional state while playing they should realise it os a mirage. If you are an excellent player, people are going to draw out on you alot more than youre going to draw out on them because theyre simply going to have the worst hand against you a lot more times than you have the worst against them. there is no way you are going to draw pout on anybody if you don't get your money in with the worst hand" Bobby baldwin
the truth is, the REALLY good players, are gonna be in showdown situations with the worst hand a decent chunk of the time. really good players makes lots of bluffs and semi bluffs. this is what i didnt understand for a while, when i always got sucked out on. i would always say to myself "how do i keep losing, if im always in with the best hand" well you can sit around all day and wait for AA. then push everytime you get it. hence your the best player in the world cuz your money has NEVER got in bad. right... no
the good players are getting there money in with strong draws, and a good amount of the time, there gonna push out there opponent, and when called, they have a good shot at winning the pot. i realized this the first time i played bill ivey. the hand went like this
6 handed table, i got 1000 in front of me, he has me covered
hes 2nd to act and he makes it 35. i look down at AA, ok here we go
i make it 120 to go, iwant action, folds to him, who calls.
flop comes 7C2C7D
he checks, i bet 210, he makes it 570, i move all in, and he calls instantly.
turn was 9c, river Jh
he flips QC8C for the winning flush.
im sitting there in shock. how can a player as well respect as bill ivey call an all in on a flush draw. so i decided to research the style a little bit, i watched him, grandiose, H@llingol play. a lot of the times there moving all in with monster draws in an attempt to pick up the pot, or gamble.
i always used to hate life whenever i got it in with the worst hand.cuz i thought thats what poker was all about. and thats why i never sucked out on anyone, cuz i would always make sure i was in with a really good hand.
now i play a much more flexible style. i make a lot of moves with draws. often get a lot of money in the middle. ussually i pick up the pot. but sometimes i get all in with only a 40% chance of winning. and i suck out about 41% of the time.
i mentioned that the object of the move with the draw is to get them to fold. obviously they wont fold everytime, and thats where variance comes in.
bill ivey made the right call mathmatically, he was gettin over 3 to 1. but in his mind i dont have AA there every time, and might just muck to the reraise, and i will muck to the reraise enough to make his play profitable. and 1 in every 3 times i dont, hell win the pot anyway.
when bill ivey hit his flush when we were all in, i jus said, o ok, well obviously im the better player, because i got all in with the best hand. its what i thought poker was about. but if your going to get chopped away all day, then get it in good, youll eventually lose.
i often hear players say, "i waited for this hand all day, i didnt play one hand, and as soon as i got my hand, i was gone. he reraised me like 15 times and i was just waiting to trap him, and he gets lucky"
heres the issue. lets say you both start with 1000 chips. and he plays you down to 700 by makin moves with draws and your folding. now you get all in KK vs AQ
your gonna double through 70% of the time. and go broke 30%
lets pretend this is a tournament
(.70)650 - (.30)650 = 260.
even tho you get your money in great, on average, your not even collecting enough for the chip lead. that may sound funny because 650 + 650 = 1300. but im saying if poker were done as a percentage chop.
meaning (whenever you are all in, you take a % of the pot that your hand is to win the hand)
when your opponent wins the hand (30% of the time he will) the tournament is over. when you win, you need to do what you just did... again.
lets say your playing the same style.
you get grinded down 400 chips, now you have 900
and you fall into the same situation KK vs AQ.
you need to dodge again to win the tournament.
what im really trying to say is, if you can grind down your opponent, to the point where you have a chance to end the tourney on an all in, and if he wisn your pretty close to even. your outplaying them.
sitting around and waiting for the perfect hand, while you might be in with the best of it more often, is not the optimal strategy.
the truth is, the REALLY good players, are gonna be in showdown situations with the worst hand a decent chunk of the time. really good players makes lots of bluffs and semi bluffs. this is what i didnt understand for a while, when i always got sucked out on. i would always say to myself "how do i keep losing, if im always in with the best hand" well you can sit around all day and wait for AA. then push everytime you get it. hence your the best player in the world cuz your money has NEVER got in bad. right... no
the good players are getting there money in with strong draws, and a good amount of the time, there gonna push out there opponent, and when called, they have a good shot at winning the pot. i realized this the first time i played bill ivey. the hand went like this
6 handed table, i got 1000 in front of me, he has me covered
hes 2nd to act and he makes it 35. i look down at AA, ok here we go
i make it 120 to go, iwant action, folds to him, who calls.
flop comes 7C2C7D
he checks, i bet 210, he makes it 570, i move all in, and he calls instantly.
turn was 9c, river Jh
he flips QC8C for the winning flush.
im sitting there in shock. how can a player as well respect as bill ivey call an all in on a flush draw. so i decided to research the style a little bit, i watched him, grandiose, H@llingol play. a lot of the times there moving all in with monster draws in an attempt to pick up the pot, or gamble.
i always used to hate life whenever i got it in with the worst hand.cuz i thought thats what poker was all about. and thats why i never sucked out on anyone, cuz i would always make sure i was in with a really good hand.
now i play a much more flexible style. i make a lot of moves with draws. often get a lot of money in the middle. ussually i pick up the pot. but sometimes i get all in with only a 40% chance of winning. and i suck out about 41% of the time.
i mentioned that the object of the move with the draw is to get them to fold. obviously they wont fold everytime, and thats where variance comes in.
bill ivey made the right call mathmatically, he was gettin over 3 to 1. but in his mind i dont have AA there every time, and might just muck to the reraise, and i will muck to the reraise enough to make his play profitable. and 1 in every 3 times i dont, hell win the pot anyway.
when bill ivey hit his flush when we were all in, i jus said, o ok, well obviously im the better player, because i got all in with the best hand. its what i thought poker was about. but if your going to get chopped away all day, then get it in good, youll eventually lose.
i often hear players say, "i waited for this hand all day, i didnt play one hand, and as soon as i got my hand, i was gone. he reraised me like 15 times and i was just waiting to trap him, and he gets lucky"
heres the issue. lets say you both start with 1000 chips. and he plays you down to 700 by makin moves with draws and your folding. now you get all in KK vs AQ
your gonna double through 70% of the time. and go broke 30%
lets pretend this is a tournament
(.70)650 - (.30)650 = 260.
even tho you get your money in great, on average, your not even collecting enough for the chip lead. that may sound funny because 650 + 650 = 1300. but im saying if poker were done as a percentage chop.
meaning (whenever you are all in, you take a % of the pot that your hand is to win the hand)
when your opponent wins the hand (30% of the time he will) the tournament is over. when you win, you need to do what you just did... again.
lets say your playing the same style.
you get grinded down 400 chips, now you have 900
and you fall into the same situation KK vs AQ.
you need to dodge again to win the tournament.
what im really trying to say is, if you can grind down your opponent, to the point where you have a chance to end the tourney on an all in, and if he wisn your pretty close to even. your outplaying them.
sitting around and waiting for the perfect hand, while you might be in with the best of it more often, is not the optimal strategy.
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
good session
Last night I played a pretty good session of 2-4 NL. i got lucky once. when you get lucky early it kind of feels like your on a freeroll and i think it helps you out emotionaly. i was on a cooler for the past couple of days and i was able to keep my emotions in tact and grind back losing only $200. Then last night I made some good reads at 2-4 NL

Saturday, July 21, 2007
Againzo!?
Friday, July 20, 2007
Thursday, July 19, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
